Yes, another good article that I have to agree with. I mean how can children learn to be violent any other way? So of course there parents have not taught them well on how to be have and act like a non-violent teen. If the kids are violent it would be the parents to blame. Also, some parents are divorced and remarried with another person. That wouldn't be a good influence on their kids. The kids would learn lots of bad things just from that. Some parents when they get divorced, their kids don't even like their new mom or dad. Therefore, the kids wouldn't listen to them and their parents would loose control of them. Some children only has one parent, and that would create rage and jealousy for those children because of the children who actually have parents. When rage and jealousy comes into play, things are not going to go well. Like teens will be frustrated.
The most common way of striking when teens are frustrated, is bulling. You would think bulling was all about the popular or cool people who bullies the uncool people, but you are wrong. Bulling is not just that, it's also about the people who are suffering and jealous of the ones who have a good life and bullies them. But, think about it, why would people have jealousy inside of them? Aren't they the same people as the people that they are jealous of? No, there have to be something that separates them like being 'unparented.' Which in the article it read: "Violence is a measure of immaturity, endemic in our teen population. And immaturity has the same root as the bitter frustration that accompanies it - the unmet emotional requirements of youth deprived of nurturing adult contact American poet and social to " the rage of the unparented'." I had my personal experience to it too. When I was in forth grade, a girl bullied me. She used to call me mean names and push me around. At first I didn't know why because I hardly knew her and I never even talked to her. But later on I found out. She has a step dad. See, she started feeling guilty after all this. So she told me that she had a step dad and she never liked him. Of coarse that must have been why. Even though my situation wansn't that serious but bulling can still be scary some times.
If teens are really frustrated, childern can get killed. Not that they did anything to deserve this, but because the murderers chose to strike on them. Like in the article:" The yount man trying to protect his home did not create the violence that killed him. The knife wielders most likely had no personal hatred toward him; perhaps they did not even know him. Their murderous frustration when he barred their entrance welled up from they knew not where." Teens are violent because they are frustrated. They get frustrated because their parents didn't teach them the right way or have lost one parent. See how this whole thing wraps up. It will end up with violent frustrated teens killing the innocent nice people.
The unavoidably frustrated is kids relying on each other. In the article it says:" Children relying on each other are unavoidably frustrated. Worse, in order to become accepted, they must become "cool" Cool is the avsence of emoton, the denial of vulnerability. Cool means the shutting down of emotion, or at least the prestense of shutdown, a false sophistication characterized by inbulnerability."Like it says in the article, if someone wanted to be accepted they need to be "cool". But cool means to team up and strike together. It's like a bunch of immature teens on the loose. That is super dangerous for the ones who did not know when they'll strike. It is not right to kill people, especially in huge gangs and groups.
That's why I agree with this article. The violent teens are suffering 'the rage of the unparented'. The parents should not let children rely on one another. And most importantly to not kill people and be a good person.
No comments:
Post a Comment